Showing posts with label Climate Summit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate Summit. Show all posts

Saturday, November 21, 2015

Do Not Neglect the Paris Climate Summit



The recent, and unfortunate terrorist attacks in Paris, Beirut, and Mali, to name a few, have been at the forefront of every major news media on the planet. Focus is on capturing the Paris accomplices, as well as preventing other attacks from happening. However, even though this attention is commonplace in times of danger, the upcoming Paris Climate Summit in December is being overshadowed for its significant importance. 

The goal of the Summit is for world leaders to create a set of reforms that would limit greenhouse gas emissions to the level of 2 degrees Celsius – the recommended level by Climate scientists that would prevent catastrophic damage to the planet. 

Some of the dangers of a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario where nothing is done include:

  • As glaciers continue to melt, sea-level rise is threatening the livelihoods of island nations, which could result in another massive flow of refugees fleeing their homes.
  • Warmer ocean temperatures will continue to affect marine life, coral reefs, as well as ocean currents that carry warmer and cooler waters throughout the planet. 
  • More floods, droughts, hurricanes, and longer forest fire seasons.

In other worlds, the Paris Climate Summit is crucial for the health and well-being of our planet and ourselves. The planet is currently at a time of grief with the recent terror attacks, but we must not forget about the other challenges we have. 
Source: The Guardian

Just in the last few months, the British government has “slashed its support for solar power and other renewable forms of energy.”[1] Instead, they cite their move to gas as more feasible. However, let’s remember that producing natural gas releases methane, which is much more powerful than carbon dioxide in the short-term. 

Moreover, with the French government clamping down on any possible security threats, they decided to ban public organizing during the upcoming Climate Summit. This ultimately undermines the ability of those affected by our warming climate to have a voice, to be seen on TV, Facebook, Twitted about, and the like. 

The voice of the people is what drives these negotiations, and with governments on the fence with committing to effective climate action, they will likely seek the easy way out without no visible media focus on public gatherings. Naomi Klein makes this point very clear in a recent Guardian article, saying that people coming from the Pacific nations – those directly affected – use the public spaces to speak out, to fight for their lives.[2]
 
It is important to remember the reasons governments will gather in Paris this December, rather than make it less important by the recent attacks, and limit the willingness of the negotiations. The Paris Climate Summit is another type of security gathering, one for our children, and for our planet.


[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/on-eve-of-paris-climate-summit-britain-pulls-the-plug-on-renewables/2015/11/20/240c5630-8311-11e5-8bd2-680fff868306_story.html
[2] http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/20/paris-climate-talks-protesters-hollande-violence

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

SCOTUS sides with the Coal Industry

This week the US Supreme Court delivered major decisions affecting the nation. For now, universal healthcare is safe, as well as your desire to marry someone from your same gender. 

However, you now have a higher chance of getting respiratory diseases thanks to SCOTUS's decision on striking down EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) rules against coal plants around the country.

That's right, this makes no sense. Why? because they are concerned with costs. 


Several opponents told the justices that it would cost money. Well, of course it would.

So, what about your health? and your children who need clean air to grow? 

Besides these consequences, the SCOTUS has likely just ruined the UN Climate Summit in Paris later this year. The US is the biggest polluter, and with no credibility back home why would other countries trust us? 

Hopefully the Obama Administration will scramble something in time to add to the negotiating table this December. Only time will tell.

The SCOTUS should have thought of those long-term consequences instead of immediate profits.

Thank you SCOTUS.